Free Speech!
Free Speech!
Posted by Chris K! on Apr 14th, 2006 - 01:40:48am

Fixed
The page has been fixed, sorry about that.
Posted by Louis C. on Dec 04th, 2005 - 01:57:20am

Err... yeah
Alright, I don't even KNOW what that was...
Posted by Louis C. on Jun 21st, 2005 - 09:25:47pm

If I was a guy...
I would probably be alot like Louis except better. Alot better. Why? I am not sure but I know I would be.

I would much rather prefer to be of the opposite gender, mostly for the sake of wear yellow fishnets and white gogo boots.

Also it would be very nice to call everything "hot" in a mimic tone of Paris Hilton.

I wonder what Louis would look like in a dress. Note: I wonder what Louis even looks like!
Posted by shatter_her on Jun 21st, 2005 - 06:20:08pm

Free Speech Page now Open!
I've reopened the free speech page, hopefully there won't be spam. I added a captcha thing just in case.
Posted by Louis C. on Jun 17th, 2005 - 02:05:51pm

Asshole
Chris, you're an asshole.
Posted by Louis C. on Feb 06th, 2005 - 01:21:40am

Simply Resellers
http://www.simplyresellers.com

Go there! Free reseller accounts! Go go go!

Hehe..shameless plug :)
Posted by Chris Kelvie on Feb 05th, 2005 - 05:09:28am

Page Fixed
Sorry about that, I just fixed the page. I didn't realize it was broken.
Posted by Louis C. on Feb 04th, 2005 - 06:18:33am

stop
talking abiout mr.bussy fag and the war on iraq
Posted by sum bitch on Nov 19th, 2004 - 10:24:07am

Toppings, toppings, *spasm*
Lunch today:

Italian Sub with Ham, Turkey, Lettuce, Cheese, and some sort of spice that I don't know the name of.

It's even better than roast beef!
Posted by Brian Jackson on Nov 02nd, 2004 - 12:15:28pm

Sandwich!
Gotta love 'em.

Louis, move the shout box up. I'm not scrolling all the way down here to talk about sandwiches.
Posted by Chris K. on Nov 01st, 2004 - 10:15:27pm

Mmm...not babies...
I had a good sandwich today... it was a REALLY GOOD sandwich...like a big sandwich so big I had to cut it in half with some roast beef and some swiss cheese and a little lettuce on some freedom bread. It was good.
Posted by Brian Jackson on Oct 31st, 2004 - 10:17:20pm

Races
there is only one race: the human race.
Posted by Jennifer T. Conrad on Oct 31st, 2004 - 12:36:20pm

More to Life
Recently I looked up "celebrity." It said a person who is celebrated. Most of our celebrities are idiots. They waste their money on stuff they don't need, they rape girls, and they also marry person after person. This is why so many of the population are following there example. Why should celebrities be celebrated?
Posted by Lady Green on Oct 31st, 2004 - 12:24:22pm

Attn: Andy Bernard
There is a time for war. A weak country will not last long, nor will a country who is pacifist be able to survive. One country, such as the US, if it pulled out will not end war. War is a trademark of human nature.

Sad, isn't it? It's too bad that simply pulling out our men can't change the fact that war happens.
Posted by Brian Jackson on Oct 30th, 2004 - 07:13:48pm

USA ownes the World
Bomb there cities, pillage there oil , sell there children rape there woman and kill them all

its the american way . right ?
Posted by john fucking wayne on Oct 29th, 2004 - 11:06:02pm

THE CANADIAN DRAFT - draft beer not men
War will never end; you the American people must end your government's aggression. I mean no disrespect to the US service people who have selflessly served and given there lives. Haven't you suffered enough and learned from history ?. Or have you not lost you taste for war yet?
Posted by Andy Bernard on Oct 29th, 2004 - 10:56:50pm

Urgh. Bleh. Yuck.
I think we can ALL agree, democrats or republicans, even independants - that it is a good thing that this campaign only has one week to go. Praise Jesus! I'm so sick of this whole thing.

*Praises Jesus*
Posted by Brian Jackson on Oct 25th, 2004 - 09:35:14pm

OK Kids: Guess who said this
Hint CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, SENATE S12254 November 9, 1997

Note the second to last sentence!

In my judgment, the Security Council should authorize a strong U.N. military response that will materially damage, if not totally destroy, as much as possible of the suspected infrastructure for developing and manufacturing weapons of mass destruction, as well as key military command and control nodes. Saddam Hussein should pay grave price, in a currency that he understands and values, for his unacceptable behavior. This should not be a strike consisting only of a handful of cruise missiles hitting isolated targets primarily of presumed symbolic value. But how long this military action might continue and how it may escalate should Saddam remain intransigent and how extensive would be its reach are for the Security Council and our allies to know and for Saddam Hussein ultimately to find out.

Should the resolve of our allies wane to pursue this matter until an acceptable inspection process has been reinstituted, which I hope will not occur and which I am pleased to say at this moment does not seem to have even begun, the United States must not lose its resolve to take action. But I think there is strong reason to believe that the multilateral resolve will persist.

Posted by Concerned citizen on Oct 24th, 2004 - 01:07:54am

Brian: heh
Yeah, I know. I see most of these LIBERAL DUMBASSES every day at school. Georgie sits at my table at lunch, I've known chris for a long time, and I see him every day in the halls and when we have a boy scout meeting. Matt's another boy scout, and uh yeah. He's the biggest liberal dumbass of them all. :-P

Oh, and I know who you are, I just use what you put your name as so that I don't confuse people.

-Louis C.
Posted by Louis on Oct 18th, 2004 - 04:45:23pm

Louis/Lewis/Luus/Lui/Loo/Loual/L
It doesn't matter how good of an argument you present, no one here will change their mind because of something they see on this page.

And for the record, AXNJAXN = Brian Jackson, as if you didn't know.
Posted by AXNJAXN (Brian Jackson) on Oct 18th, 2004 - 02:02:39pm

heh
well, somebody's ignorant.
and MY NAME IS LOUIS!!!!!!!!
Posted by Louis on Oct 17th, 2004 - 11:47:07pm

Wrong, the race is about Bush PERIOD
Lewis, Bush has been president for nearly 4 years and I believe that he has done a terrible job as president. We have a huge budget deficit and have lost millions of jobs. I don't hate Bush, I hate his policies and the war HE started in Iraq. Over 1,000 US soliders have died in Iraq for a war that has only made our country less safe. Those soldiers will not have the chance to be teachers or anything else. As soon as our military leaves Iraq, which will happen whether Bush or Kerry wins, the country will collapse into complete chaos. Guess what that leads too; terrorist training grounds. Guess who they are going to target; the USA.


Posted by Matt K. on Oct 17th, 2004 - 08:57:36pm

Matt: What the hell are you talking about???
I'm not going to join the military because I'm planning on going to college and becoming a math teacher or a professor. If I had no other plans, sure! Why not do some good with my life?
Also, this election is about Bush AND Kerry. People like you are idiots. The only reason why you want Kerry to be president is because you don't like Bush. Well you know what? I highly reccomend listening to what Kerry's saying and asking yourself "hmm.. how's he going to do this?"
For instance, he wants to send more troops to iraq. Well, where's he going to get these troops?
He says he has plans at his website. His so called "plans" don't exist. Yeah, sure there are links to what he calls "plans" on his website, but all they say is exactly what he said in the debates. He goes into no details whatsoever. He simply says he has a plan to do something, and that it's better than Bush's plan. The only thing it says on the website is how he's going to get the money. The estimates on the website are highly exaggerated. The only plan I think might work is the healthcare one, but I don't really agree with the whole concept of national healthcare.
I'm not even going to think about supporting kerry until I see some more realistic plans.

The reason why I support bush? Because I know where he stands.

The reason why the race is basically tied is simply because Kerry says that he agrees with everyone. If people would just pay more attention, they'd see how unrealistic Kerry's plans are, and they'd see the fact that he stands for and against the war, he stands for and against gay marriage, etc...

Oh, and my name's LOUIS, not LEWIS.

Posted by Louis C. on Oct 16th, 2004 - 11:13:25pm

Lewis, Answer the Question
My previous post was quite clear. If you support the war, are you willing to serve your country by joining the military when you turn 18? It is a simple yes or no question that I think you can figure out. You spend a lot of time saying all the things that you find wrong with Kerry. If Bush has been such a great president for the last four years, then why is the presidential race basically tied. This election is about Bush, not Kerry. Bush is the incumbent. If you think he has done a great job you vote for him. Otherwise, you vote for Kerry. It is that simple Lewis....
Posted by Matt K. on Oct 16th, 2004 - 07:44:58pm

HEY MATT!!
Enough with the god damn war. Once you post something that remotely makes sense, I might decide to respond to it. Since you don't seem smart enough to even understand what I'm trying to say here, I'll respond this one time.

AXNJAXN: I agree with you 100% even though I think this whole war topic is overdone.
MATT!!!!! THE WAR WAS NOT BUSH'S FAULT! Bush has no power to declare war, and many countries agree that it was the right thing to do. Even Kerry wants to keep the war going, and he's NOT going to bring back troops, even though he said he would at one point. Instead, he plans on sending MORE people, while Bush wants to train iraqis (which he is), and get them to fight for themselves.
Posted by Louis C. on Oct 13th, 2004 - 11:05:13pm

The other side of the coin
People in the army are there for the purpose of war, among other things. It's not as if there's a lot of anti-war sentiment in the army. People in the army are doing just that - putting their money where their mouths is (grammar?) and are risking their lives for there country.

I wonder how the post-WWII culture would react to this kind of criticism of this war.
Posted by AXNJAXN on Oct 13th, 2004 - 02:03:51pm

To the supporters of Bush's war in Irag
To those of you who support the war Bush started in Iraq I have this question for you. Are you willing to put your life where your mouth is? If you think going into Iraq was such a great idea are you going to join the military when you turn 18 and serve your country. Or, are you going to be like our leaders such as Bush, Cheany and Rumsfeld who talk tough now, but were no where near a battle field when they were young. It is one thing to be pro war when you are safely tucked in your bed at night thousands of miles from the bullets and the bombs, but another to put your life where your mouth is. Think about it..........
Posted by Matt K. on Oct 11th, 2004 - 08:49:24pm

Eh?
Matt Rules.
Louis Doesn't
:-D
:-)
:-l
:-(
:-D
Posted by on Oct 11th, 2004 - 07:57:39pm

I guess...
I guess there aren't too many conservatives or republicans on this page... it's a shame.
Posted by AXNJAXN on Oct 09th, 2004 - 11:48:31pm

Heh
I just wanna say that Matt is an idiot :-)
Posted by Louis on Oct 09th, 2004 - 12:32:12am

Passing Along..
Your site is awesome! Hahaha, nice stories. Keep it up!
Posted by Norma Jean on Oct 08th, 2004 - 08:08:06am

Matt Rules
I just want to say that Matt amazing!

Posted by chris (not chris Kelvie) on Oct 06th, 2004 - 09:02:18pm

Pink Underwear...
...Is not the topic of what I have to say :) Yeah, I'm just a random person who stumbled (more like "fell") into your site..and...this post isn't political.. it's.. actually..I care about politics as much as I care the color of my underwear (ok, maybe it has..a little to do with this paragraph but that was only 1 line).. Ok bye now. (btw, I love your bush poem because it's funny.)
Posted by Ying-Ying on Oct 02nd, 2004 - 08:57:42pm

Bush Stinks
Breaking News!!!
George Bush must be doing a great job on the war on terror because we just caught the guy who wrote Peace Train

Posted by Matt K on Oct 02nd, 2004 - 07:55:20pm

Another Poem
Anothe Very Funny Poem

Bush made dupes out of our troops!
A clue to just how low he stoops!


Over a thousand Americans died
Because Bush and the White House lied.
There never were any WMD
It's US who lost our liberty.
He made this country split! Divide!
With his crock of patriotic pride.
It's US who now are deep in debt.
Iraq was never an imminent threat.


We're all victims of White House lies ...
White House wool pulled over our eyes!
And all the reasons they gave for war
Were just pure Bushit. Nothing more!
It was always for power and profits and spoil
And gaining control of Middle East oil.


A trick on the public! A hoax! A scam!
But, now, it's time to give a damn
Before another "pre-emptive" attack.
It's time to take our country back
From a lackey Congress that jumps through
hoops
While Bush makes dupes out of our troops.
Gus St. Anthony

Posted by Matt K on Oct 02nd, 2004 - 07:52:11pm

Anti Bush Poem
This poem is very funny.

'Twas the night before Baghdad



Twas the night before Baghdad
And all through the base
Not a heartbeat was silent
Not a smile on one face
The soldiers at attention
Fists raised in the air
Saddam is a monster!
We must all go there!

So we loaded the planes
With our guns and our tanks
And we sent all the soldiers
To Kuwaits outer banks
From Kuwait, from Turkey
From Saudi and more
With battering rams
We knocked on his door

The Fedayin heard
All the military clatter
And ran to Saddam
To ask what was the matter
Dont worry he said
With a heartening ring
They financed my reign
They wont do this thing

We bombed all the buildings
Til the fires were glowing
While Baby Bush yelled
Keep the oil pipes flowing
He should be a magician
Our Baby Bush, cuz you see
He created the biggest illusion -
The WMDs

He lied to us all
About terror and pain
When all that he's after
Is monetary gain
For Daddy, and Barbara
And Baby Bush too
Believe there is no such thing
As too much oil revenue

Some people believe
That its for our own good
To bomb and to kill
To shed innocent blood
They sleep in their beds
Oblivious to lies
While we who have wakened
Hear bloodcurdling cries
Cries from our brothers
Our fathers and sons
Sent to fight in a war
That cannot be won
We liberated them!

Our Baby Bush chimes
That is why they attack us
Time after time
With Christmas upon us
He steps up his work
Of campaigning again
The self serving jerk!
He'll don his flight suit
He'll have all his fun
Wishing Merry Christmas! Keep fighting!
And to all....Duck and Run!

written by Cynthia Anderson, mother of a soldier.

Posted by Matt K on Oct 02nd, 2004 - 07:44:33pm

Bush Stinks
We went to war for bad reasons. Bush said there were terrorists inside Iraq before we went in. He said that Iraq was harboring Al Quieda terrorists but US troops found no Al Quidea camps terrorists. It is was also said that Saddam was associated with Osama when thry both hated each other. Saddam did not want them in his country.
Posted by Matt K on Oct 02nd, 2004 - 07:39:42pm

GO KERRY!!!
GO KERRY

I just wanted to say, about your comment about Kerry voting to go to war and how you said if we went to Osama then Sadaam would get more chances. Actually, if you watched the post show, they explained this. The reason is that Sadaam was very weak and was being weakened gradually. Also, SADAAM DID NOT ATTACK US! OSAMA DID. We should have got rid of Sadaam when we had him, then take care of Sadaam later on. Also, if you listened carefully, you would know that BUSH ASKED TERRORISTS TO TAKE CARE OF OSAMA!!! These were the people who were trying to kill us, and now they are suddenly helping us? Let's try a no for that one. We had Osama cornered in the mountains, and Bush left it up to the other guys there to finish the job. Guess what. THEY DIDN'T. Many things about what Bush did are incorrect, but there is WAY TO MUCH TO TYPE. So, i will say just one more thing.
You said something about Bush being a good debater. I somewhat agree, but during this debate, HE DID TERRIBLY!!! In every answer, he said the same exact thing! His only defence was that Kerry changes his mind too much. Kerry changes his mind because as the world learns more information, plans should be changed to remain effective. Bush seems to be afrais of change and is sticking to his original plan. 3 years after the war started, what have we done? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!! The person responsible for 9/11, OSAMA, IS STILL ON THE LOOSE! He was the whole point of the war! Who cares if Kerry changes his mind FOR THE GOOD, but Bush is attacking the wrong people! Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Now we have made another enemy. Kerry will fix this problem quickly an d Iraq will be another Democratic nation on our side.
I'll beat u up during lunch :-D
Posted by George Glock on Oct 01st, 2004 - 07:42:35pm

Good.
Just wanted to make sure people knew.
Posted by Chris Kelvie on Sep 30th, 2004 - 09:00:06pm

Chris is a friend of mine
Chris is a friend of mine, not you, Chris K.
Posted by Louis on Sep 30th, 2004 - 08:26:32pm

It wasn't me talking....suckers
Well...I only made one post here..

Every other post was by someone else
Posted by The Real Chris Kelvie on Sep 30th, 2004 - 12:47:20am

help CAT STEVENS
vote for Kerry to help CAT STEVENS get back into america.

The man who sang about love and peace in the 70's is not a terrorist!
Posted by on Sep 29th, 2004 - 07:55:14pm

thank you Brian Jackson
I am more anti-bush than pro-Kerry.
I see where you get your ideas from, but i can't see how someone could vote for Bush with the things he's done. the war is the biggest thing i dislike about Bush. If he had said he went in to free the Iraqi's, fine. But he didn't. He went in for WMD's that aren't and weren't there. I don't believe in war in the first place, but it would have been more acceptable. i also don't like his environmental policies, and i am a vegetarian myself. Thank you for your opinion, i will think about it, but also look at mine and try to see from my point of veiw. Have a good life!

Posted by chris on Sep 29th, 2004 - 07:48:46pm

Attn: 'chris' (2)
You're entitled to your own opinions - I don't intend to attack them any further. I'm not looking to debate anyone on what political plicy is best. My point is that you sounded a lot like many anti-Bush Kerry supporters (or anti-Kerry, those are just as bad). Mr. Kerry is looking out for america's best interests too, but the reason I support Bush is because his policies are what I believe to be the better choice. I have no problem with letting anyone vote for Kerry, but I do have a problem with people who vote out of ignorance or those who base all of their political decisions on propaganda (see also: Michael Moore).
Posted by Brian Jackson on Sep 28th, 2004 - 10:50:00pm

hey louis
The gas prices in other country's would be cheaper if we have direct ties with them. But, high gas prices wouldn't be bad. That would lower the number of gas-wasting SUV's that waste and ruin the environment, casuing global warming.

Also, everyone cares what the war is about! it's really important! Sure, congress declared war, on false information the Bush Administration gave them about WMD's! If the UN also recomended the war, then why didn't they back us up?

and it is bush's fault we have a national debt, becasue he was the one who really wanted to go to war (other than Dick Cheney. Have you noticed than many things dealing with the war have helped Halliburton, former company?).
Posted by chris on Sep 28th, 2004 - 08:54:33pm

Hmm... So we're supposed to rely on other countries for oil?
So, Chris, you're saying that we should rely on oil from othe countries instead of digging our own, which would get us lowe gas prices and it'll allow us to trade oil just like the other countries do, which would improve our economy. Instead of having lower gas prices and a better economy, you want us to continue buying oil and lowering our economy little by little. It doesn't matter if alaska is a nature reserve or anything, it's just LAND. I have respect for the environment just like anyone else, but I see no reason why oil would destroy alaska, unless there was a big oil spill or something.
WHO FREAKING CARES ABOUT WHAT THE WHOLE WAR IS ABOUT???? Bush doesn't even have the power to declare war, that's CONGRESS's job. If you say "but he reccomended it", I will go ballistic because the UN also reccomended it, and Congress voted for it. It's not even bush's fault for the whole war, so just lay off on that.
WE ARE AT WAR!!! Every single time we've been in war, we've been in debt. Every war. Once again, it's the war's fault for the debt, not bush's. And remember what I said in the last paragraph:It was Congress who started the war.
Posted by Louis on Sep 28th, 2004 - 08:41:48pm

Express yourself
I'm expressing with my full capabilities and I believe bush is a loser and chris is my hero
Posted by John on Sep 28th, 2004 - 08:39:26pm

attn. "Brian Jackson"- here are some comments on your retort to what i said
1. poeple polluting isn't the reason why Bush is horrible for the environment, it's his support of oil drilling everywhere, even in Alaska which is basically one huge nature reserve.
2.The war in Iraq was to look for WMD's, not to turn it into a democracy.
3.yes, he should focus on profit, but not make it his priority while we are a war in another country with the lives of many at stake.
4. Yes, while Clinton was president (a good president who is a DEMOCRAT), the country was wondering what to do with the national surplus, with Bush as President, we are wondering what to do to getrid of the national deficit.
6. True, nobody was forced to fight, but they still died. And no, we weren't only targetting civilians, but the majority of deaths was civilians.
7. "made up stuff." ? This is all true, and if you don't believe it, read the news once in a while.

One more thing, did you know that since Bush has become President, the health care premium has risen 17%?


Posted by chris on Sep 28th, 2004 - 08:23:44pm

Attn Jalada
But was he abusing his people? Yes, he was. Even though he may not have WMDs, and even though it's not the reason we went to war, that doesn't change the fact that we helped out Iraq big time. It may take a while for things to get better there, but now they are not under the rule of a dictator anymore, and that's a good thing.
Also, they still might have WMDs, just because they haven't been found doesn't mean they don't exist.
Posted by Louis on Sep 27th, 2004 - 04:58:56pm